Verdict
Deep US integrations, an official Coinbase partnership and clean TurboTax export make this the path of least resistance for American filers. It is also the most expensive option here once your transaction count gets real.
- Best for
- US filers with exchange-heavy histories
- Cost
- Free tier; paid plans from ~$59 per tax year
What works
- Official Coinbase partnership makes that import path reliable
- TurboTax and tax-professional export work without manual reformatting
- Portfolio tracking is usable year-round, not just at filing time
- Support for US-specific edge cases is stronger than competitors'
What does not
- Higher tiers reach several hundred dollars per tax year
- Transaction-count tiers punish DeFi users disproportionately
- Non-US report formats are weaker than Koinly's
- Free tier is too limited to validate a real portfolio
CoinTracker's position in the US market comes from integration rather than from features. It is an official Coinbase tax partner, it exports cleanly into TurboTax, and tax professionals recognise its reports without asking questions. For a filer whose history is a Coinbase account and a Kraken account, the whole process takes an evening.
The pricing
A free tier exists and is too limited to validate a real portfolio. Paid plans start around $59 per tax year and rise through several hundred dollars for the highest transaction tiers.

The tiers are transaction-count based, and that is where the product becomes expensive for the wrong people. Somebody who bought Bitcoin four times a year pays the lowest tier. Somebody who used a DeFi protocol regularly — where a single liquidity position can generate dozens of on-chain events — lands in a tier costing several times more, for a portfolio that may be considerably smaller.
Where it is genuinely strong
Coinbase imports, which are the single most common data source for US filers and the most reliably handled here.
TurboTax hand-off, which removes the most error-prone manual step in the entire process.
US-specific tax treatment questions, where the guidance content is better written than competitors'.
Year-round portfolio tracking, so the data is not a March scramble through five years of emails.
Where it is weaker
International coverage. Report formats outside the US exist but are thinner than Koinly's, and if you file in two jurisdictions this is the wrong tool and will cost you more to arrive at a worse answer.
DeFi classification also lags. Complex positions require more manual intervention than the marketing implies, and the transaction tier you are paying for makes that sting considerably more.
The reconciliation reality
Every tool in this category shares the same core problem, and it is worth repeating because people assume the software has solved it: a transfer between your own wallets can be read as a sale, a missing cost basis defaults to zero, and an exchange that shut down years ago cannot be re-imported at all.
The most expensive number in crypto tax is a cost basis of zero. It is also the default when the import cannot find one.
Reconcile transfers first, before looking at any total. Everything downstream depends on it, and a report built on unreconciled transfers is confidently wrong rather than roughly right.

Verdict
The portfolio side
Unlike CoinLedger, CoinTracker is usable all year: connected accounts update, unrealised positions are tracked, and the tax position is visible before December rather than after. For anyone who might want to realise a loss deliberately or time a disposal across a tax year boundary, that visibility is worth something real.
It is not as good as a dedicated tracker at the portfolio job — the DeFi coverage is narrower than CoinStats' — but it is good enough that you are not maintaining two products.
Where the transaction count comes from
A single afternoon of DeFi activity can generate more taxable events than a year of buying Bitcoin on an exchange. Approve a token, swap it, deposit into a pool, receive a reward, claim it, withdraw, unwrap: that is seven on-chain events from one decision, and each one counts towards your tier.
This is why two users with identical portfolio values can face a fivefold difference in what the software costs them. If your history is on-chain, price the tiers before you commit — and if you are choosing between tools on cost, the transaction count is the number to compare, not the headline price.
Working with an accountant
The export formats are recognised by US tax professionals, which sounds trivial and saves real money. An accountant who receives a familiar report reviews it; one who receives a novel CSV bills you for the time spent understanding it.
If somebody else is filing for you, ask which tool they prefer before choosing one. The answer in the US is frequently this one, and the fee difference against a cheaper competitor disappears in a single hour of professional time.
Score: 7.3. The smoothest path for a US filer with an exchange-based history, and an expensive one for anybody whose transaction count reflects on-chain activity rather than portfolio size. For international filers, Koinly is the better product at a lower price.
